While working on some code that allowed a user to perform a search using only a postcode, I discovered some strange behaviour with the Google Maps API.

According to the Google Maps API documentation (https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/geocoding/intro#ComponentFiltering), component filtering allows you to filter by postal_code and country, which would suit this need perfectly. I gave this a try, and upon initial testing, it seemed that this was the solution, however, after further testing, it was found that for some postcodes (specifically, some in NSW and ACT), the geocoding query would return ZERO_RESULTS. Maybe this is because there is an overlap in the 2000 series postcodes ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

An example of the URL I was using for this is shown below (note that postcode 2022 and country AU will return ZER0_RESULTS):


There are many examples on Stack Overflow of people using this format to search by postcode and claim this to be the solution, but most of them are either from other countries, where this probably isn’t an issue, or they mustn’t have discovered this issue.

According to the Google Maps API documentation, you can use administrative_area (among other fields) to “influence” results, so I tried adding the state to this field, and I found that this made everything work properly. That means that the following URL will geocode the postcode 2022:


The issue I had then was that if the user is searching only using the postcode, I had to find a way to provide the state for that postcode to Google so it could geocode the postcode properly. To do this, I created a function that gives me the state based on a postcode as shown below (although this is not a perfect solution, because new postcodes are added from time to time. Potentially a call to an Australia Post API or similar may work better going forward):

public static string PostcodeToState(int postcode)
var postcodes = new List();
postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(1000,1000).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("NSW",x)));
postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(2000, 600).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("NSW", x)));
postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(2619, 280).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("NSW", x)));
postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(2921, 79).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("NSW", x)));

postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(200, 100).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("ACT", x)));
postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(2600, 19).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("ACT", x)));
postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(2900, 21).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("ACT", x)));

postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(3000, 1000).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("VIC", x)));
postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(8000, 1000).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("VIC", x)));

postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(4000, 1000).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("QLD", x)));
postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(9000, 1000).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("QLD", x)));

postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(5000, 1000).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("SA", x)));

postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(6000, 798).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("WA", x)));
postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(6800, 200).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("WA", x)));

postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(7000, 1000).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("TAS", x)));

postcodes.AddRange(Enumerable.Range(800, 200).Select(x => new KeyValuePair("NT", x)));

postcodes.Add(new KeyValuePair("ACT", 2620));
postcodes.Add(new KeyValuePair("NSW", 3644));
postcodes.Add(new KeyValuePair("NSW", 3707));

return postcodes.Where(x => x.Value == postcode).Select(x => x.Key).FirstOrDefault();


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s